This document is the Neighbourhood Plan for the parish of Puddletown. When finalised, it will have the official status of being part of the “development plan” for the area, to be used by Dorset Council to determine planning applications, and therefore what is built (and what isn’t). At this time, it has been revised following the pre-submission consultation and submitted to Dorset Council, and further changes may be suggested by the independent Examiner. Puddletown residents then get the final say (through our own referendum) as to whether the plan should be used.
The Plan has been prepared by local residents, shaped by the feedback from the various consultations, with technical input from a range of planning and other experts, on behalf of the Parish Council (who are legally responsible for Neighbourhood Planning).
This Plan looks ahead to 2031. But we will need to consider reviewing this Plan before then - probably in about 2024 (when the new Dorset Local Plan has been agreed).
A key message that came through all the consultations was how much local people valued their environment. So this has very much shaped this Plan, and we have included policies to protect important green spaces in and around the village (such as the Green) but also a number of policies to protect other landscape, wildlife and historic features such as the watermeadows, the groups of trees, woodlands and copses dotting the landscape and the hedge-lined rural lanes, and the views out to the surrounding countryside. The history of the village and cultural connections (particularly with Thomas Hardy) are also highlighted.
The main need for development in our area is for housing, and, in particular, genuinely affordable housing. When we consulted, most people felt that the previous rate of growth (around 6 to 7 dwellings per year) was acceptable, and (following further checks) we have taken this as the basis for the housing target in our plan. This level of growth is underpinned by a desire to keep Puddletown as a thriving village. No community can stand still - you either go backwards or forwards - so development is needed in order to ensure that we keep and enhance our businesses and services which we all like so much, such as our schools, the surgery, village shop, local pub etc…
We have identified two sites, in addition to that already with planning permission, to meet this need. The first is the lower-lying section of the field off Athelhampton Road, for housing, publicly accessible green space and an area for community use. The second site is the built-up yard area at Northbrook Farm, for housing with a green space for public use to the south. Because these sites will provide enough housing, we do not need to have inappropriate infilling that would reduce the open, rural character of the village, or release other greenfield sites.
To remain a thriving village and retain our sense of community, we also need to support our community facilities. We have reserved land for the middle school expansion as well as the expansion of the cemetery, and will look to negotiate funding to improve these and other facilities, such as the recreation ground, sports pavilion and village hall, where we can.
We have found no evidence of any significant need to identify more employment land, and we understand that the local plan policies wouldn’t prevent the expansion of the existing employment areas or small-scale sites on the edge of the village from being considered. So we don’t think we need to include specific policies in our plan for employment, but we will keep this topic under review.
There is also design guidance in the plan, that reflects the distinctive character of our village, lessons learnt from recent developments, and the changes that may be needed to support zero-carbon homes, such as solar panels and ground source heat pumps, both of which had a lot of local support.
We ask developers to use the latest information on flood risk to ensure that development does not take place in the flood areas or worsen flooding off-site, and similarly raised awareness of the need to properly assess the impacts of noise from traffic on the A35.
Traffic (speed and parking) is a real concern for local residents. So we also want to make sure that people are able to walk and cycle safely around our village (and out to the surrounding countryside and even on to Tolpuddle and Dorchester) through improving the area’s interconnectivity. So we have included a policy that deals with these matters, as well as one on having enough parking provision.
Altogether, there are 16 planning policies that we have drafted, together with 6 projects identified for the Parish Council and others to take forward.